<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Rants and Revelations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.xcski.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.xcski.com</link>
	<description>Everything I used to bore people on newsgroups and mailing lists with, now in one inconvenient place.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:45:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I hate Sprint, reason #4523 by Totty</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2010/03/18/why-i-hate-sprint-reason-4523/comment-page-1#comment-104053</link>
		<dc:creator>Totty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xcski.com/?p=2326#comment-104053</guid>
		<description>The Droid is okay, I guess, I&#039;m using the Motorola Milestone which has multitouch but less navigation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Droid is okay, I guess, I&#8217;m using the Motorola Milestone which has multitouch but less navigation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I hate Sprint, reason #4523 by Vicki</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2010/03/18/why-i-hate-sprint-reason-4523/comment-page-1#comment-104050</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xcski.com/?p=2326#comment-104050</guid>
		<description>Did you know that the Palm Pre Plus is presently available at Verizon?  If it&#039;s true that they can get us out of our Sprint contract....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you know that the Palm Pre Plus is presently available at Verizon?  If it&#8217;s true that they can get us out of our Sprint contract&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I hate Sprint, reason #4523 by Paul Tomblin</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2010/03/18/why-i-hate-sprint-reason-4523/comment-page-1#comment-104046</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tomblin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xcski.com/?p=2326#comment-104046</guid>
		<description>@James, that guy seems to be comparing Droid to Pre on the basis of how well it works as a Debian box, not on how well it works as a smart phone.  Which is kind of important to me, since, you know, that&#039;s why I bought a smart phone.  If I wanted a Debian box, I would have bought an EEE PC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@James, that guy seems to be comparing Droid to Pre on the basis of how well it works as a Debian box, not on how well it works as a smart phone.  Which is kind of important to me, since, you know, that&#8217;s why I bought a smart phone.  If I wanted a Debian box, I would have bought an EEE PC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I hate Sprint, reason #4523 by Matt katz</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2010/03/18/why-i-hate-sprint-reason-4523/comment-page-1#comment-104045</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt katz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xcski.com/?p=2326#comment-104045</guid>
		<description>Cough, droid, cough</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cough, droid, cough</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I hate Sprint, reason #4523 by James</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2010/03/18/why-i-hate-sprint-reason-4523/comment-page-1#comment-104044</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xcski.com/?p=2326#comment-104044</guid>
		<description>http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/pre_to_droid/ suggests you can break phone contracts with no termination fee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/pre_to_droid/" rel="nofollow">http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/pre_to_droid/</a> suggests you can break phone contracts with no termination fee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Today&#8217;s rather inconvenient discovery by James</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2010/03/16/todays-rather-inconvenient-discovery/comment-page-1#comment-104043</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xcski.com/?p=2322#comment-104043</guid>
		<description>I often use rsync --numeric-ids, although more for the (theoretical? I certainly haven&#039;t tested it) performance gain from not having to look them up in LDAP. Not that it&#039;d help in your case - Debian uids &gt; 100 are created on-demand when you install a package that requires a uid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I often use rsync &#8211;numeric-ids, although more for the (theoretical? I certainly haven&#8217;t tested it) performance gain from not having to look them up in LDAP. Not that it&#8217;d help in your case &#8211; Debian uids &gt; 100 are created on-demand when you install a package that requires a uid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Today&#8217;s rather inconvenient discovery by Paul Tomblin</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2010/03/16/todays-rather-inconvenient-discovery/comment-page-1#comment-104042</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tomblin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xcski.com/?p=2322#comment-104042</guid>
		<description>All I know is that the postgresql user is uid 106 on xen1, but uid 114 on my home box.  When I rsync from xen1 to home, the backups of postgresql files have uid 114.

ptomblin@xen1:~$ ls -ldn /var/lib/postgres
drwxr-xr-x 2 106 108 4096 2009-01-18 09:21 /var/lib/postgres

homebox:~&gt; ls -ldn /1u_backup/xen1/Sun/var/lib/postgres
drwxr-xr-x 2 114 123 4096 2009-01-18 09:21 /1u_backup/xen1/Sun/var/lib/postgres/

And of course when I restore on the new xen1-test machine, the postgresql user hasn&#039;t been created yet, so rsync doesn&#039;t know how to translate back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I know is that the postgresql user is uid 106 on xen1, but uid 114 on my home box.  When I rsync from xen1 to home, the backups of postgresql files have uid 114.</p>
<p>ptomblin@xen1:~$ ls -ldn /var/lib/postgres<br />
drwxr-xr-x 2 106 108 4096 2009-01-18 09:21 /var/lib/postgres</p>
<p>homebox:~> ls -ldn /1u_backup/xen1/Sun/var/lib/postgres<br />
drwxr-xr-x 2 114 123 4096 2009-01-18 09:21 /1u_backup/xen1/Sun/var/lib/postgres/</p>
<p>And of course when I restore on the new xen1-test machine, the postgresql user hasn&#8217;t been created yet, so rsync doesn&#8217;t know how to translate back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Today&#8217;s rather inconvenient discovery by JK</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2010/03/16/todays-rather-inconvenient-discovery/comment-page-1#comment-104041</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xcski.com/?p=2322#comment-104041</guid>
		<description>I just looked and I do not see that conversion happening between my server and the systems that are rsync mirror backing it up.  

wonder what&#039;s happening to you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just looked and I do not see that conversion happening between my server and the systems that are rsync mirror backing it up.  </p>
<p>wonder what&#8217;s happening to you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Today&#8217;s rather inconvenient discovery by JK</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2010/03/16/todays-rather-inconvenient-discovery/comment-page-1#comment-104040</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xcski.com/?p=2322#comment-104040</guid>
		<description>the more i think about this the more i just can&#039;t believe it&#039;s doing this &#039;wrong&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the more i think about this the more i just can&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s doing this &#8216;wrong&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Today&#8217;s rather inconvenient discovery by JK</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2010/03/16/todays-rather-inconvenient-discovery/comment-page-1#comment-104039</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xcski.com/?p=2322#comment-104039</guid>
		<description>uh oh. I&#039;m using rsync from three remote system to do mirror&#039;d backups from my server. each night they each rsync from my server to themselves (using the sh script you once sent me).

now i&#039;m worried that if i need to recover from them it&#039;s going to be a huge pain.

i&#039;ll try checking UIDs across the systems, but, no way they are going to line up right.

wait.  it just uses the uid numbers so even if they show as the &#039;wrong&#039; UID on the backup system, if they are moved back to the original system won&#039;t they be owned correctly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uh oh. I&#8217;m using rsync from three remote system to do mirror&#8217;d backups from my server. each night they each rsync from my server to themselves (using the sh script you once sent me).</p>
<p>now i&#8217;m worried that if i need to recover from them it&#8217;s going to be a huge pain.</p>
<p>i&#8217;ll try checking UIDs across the systems, but, no way they are going to line up right.</p>
<p>wait.  it just uses the uid numbers so even if they show as the &#8216;wrong&#8217; UID on the backup system, if they are moved back to the original system won&#8217;t they be owned correctly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
