That’s better!

On my test system, with the two new disks and with the three domU guest systems set up and running (but not connected to the outside world, so the load is obviously lower), I run tiobench in the dom0. Executive summary:
read/write rates around 5 times faster, and no awful latency. The worse latency on the Caviar disks was 121588.99 ms, and on these disks it’s 6077.56 ms.

I can’t wait to get these disks over to the colo. If all goes well, it will just be a simple matter of shutting down the domUs, making a final copy from the old disks to the new disks, and then swapping the disks.

Full details below the cut.

No size specified, using 2000 MB

Unit information
================
File size = megabytes
Blk Size  = bytes
Rate      = megabytes per second
CPU%      = percentage of CPU used during the test
Latency   = milliseconds
Lat%      = percent of requests that took longer than X seconds
CPU Eff   = Rate divided by CPU% - throughput per cpu load

Sequential Reads
                              File  Blk   Num                   Avg      Maximum      Lat%     Lat%    CPU
Identifier                    Size  Size  Thr   Rate  (CPU%)  Latency    Latency      >2s      >10s    Eff
---------------------------- ------ ----- ---  ------ ------ --------- -----------  -------- -------- -----
2.6.32-5-xen-amd64            2000  4096    1  104.39 38.18%     0.036       71.20   0.00000  0.00000   273
2.6.32-5-xen-amd64            2000  4096    2  168.03 145.4%     0.044      110.11   0.00000  0.00000   116
2.6.32-5-xen-amd64            2000  4096    4  171.72 272.9%     0.080      258.17   0.00000  0.00000    63
2.6.32-5-xen-amd64            2000  4096    8  159.19 490.6%     0.177      464.87   0.00000  0.00000    32

Random Reads
                              File  Blk   Num                   Avg      Maximum      Lat%     Lat%    CPU
Identifier                    Size  Size  Thr   Rate  (CPU%)  Latency    Latency      >2s      >10s    Eff
---------------------------- ------ ----- ---  ------ ------ --------- -----------  -------- -------- -----
2.6.32-5-xen-amd64            2000  4096    1    0.55 1.150%     7.122       63.11   0.00000  0.00000    48
2.6.32-5-xen-amd64            2000  4096    2    1.07 3.731%     7.264       62.82   0.00000  0.00000    29
2.6.32-5-xen-amd64            2000  4096    4    1.17 4.832%    13.079       88.93   0.00000  0.00000    24
2.6.32-5-xen-amd64            2000  4096    8    1.35 12.47%    22.671      153.44   0.00000  0.00000    11

Sequential Writes
                              File  Blk   Num                   Avg      Maximum      Lat%     Lat%    CPU
Identifier                    Size  Size  Thr   Rate  (CPU%)  Latency    Latency      >2s      >10s    Eff
---------------------------- ------ ----- ---  ------ ------ --------- -----------  -------- -------- -----
2.6.32-5-xen-amd64            2000  4096    1   70.68 61.47%     0.053      322.24   0.00000  0.00000   115
2.6.32-5-xen-amd64            2000  4096    2   67.38 145.6%     0.110      524.87   0.00000  0.00000    46
2.6.32-5-xen-amd64            2000  4096    4   64.97 342.9%     0.228     1004.67   0.00000  0.00000    19
2.6.32-5-xen-amd64            2000  4096    8   61.39 803.3%     0.471     1328.05   0.00000  0.00000     8

Random Writes
                              File  Blk   Num                   Avg      Maximum      Lat%     Lat%    CPU
Identifier                    Size  Size  Thr   Rate  (CPU%)  Latency    Latency      >2s      >10s    Eff
---------------------------- ------ ----- ---  ------ ------ --------- -----------  -------- -------- -----
2.6.32-5-xen-amd64            2000  4096    1    1.36 0.940%     0.535     1522.11   0.00000  0.00000   145
2.6.32-5-xen-amd64            2000  4096    2    1.55 3.210%     0.380     1022.24   0.00000  0.00000    48
2.6.32-5-xen-amd64            2000  4096    4    1.59 12.08%     0.140       53.50   0.00000  0.00000    13
2.6.32-5-xen-amd64            2000  4096    8    1.50 16.98%     5.722     6077.56   0.12500  0.00000     9