<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yeah, that makes sense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.xcski.com/2007/11/17/yeah-that-makes-sense/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2007/11/17/yeah-that-makes-sense</link>
	<description>Everything I used to bore people on newsgroups and mailing lists with, now in one inconvenient place.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anthony de Boer</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2007/11/17/yeah-that-makes-sense#comment-64435</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony de Boer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 04:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xcski.com/2007/11/17/yeah-that-makes-sense#comment-64435</guid>
		<description>Might almost be a case for a portable device with wireless email/ssh/browser, so that your personal communications don't touch the work network at all.  Granted, that pushes your costs up (though does let you have access when you're elsewhere too), and there may be issues with anti-camera rules and trying to find something that doesn't have one.  You really don't want to be caught bypassing the work firewall or breaking the rules for the corporate network, so stepping entirely aside from it may be the safer path.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might almost be a case for a portable device with wireless email/ssh/browser, so that your personal communications don&#8217;t touch the work network at all.  Granted, that pushes your costs up (though does let you have access when you&#8217;re elsewhere too), and there may be issues with anti-camera rules and trying to find something that doesn&#8217;t have one.  You really don&#8217;t want to be caught bypassing the work firewall or breaking the rules for the corporate network, so stepping entirely aside from it may be the safer path.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#38;rw</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2007/11/17/yeah-that-makes-sense#comment-64314</link>
		<dc:creator>&#38;rw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 10:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xcski.com/2007/11/17/yeah-that-makes-sense#comment-64314</guid>
		<description>Depending on the setup, ssh/https might be quite a lot less suspicious, esp. with an sshd on 443 somewhere.

Though a big company probably makes the classic man-in-the-middle attack on https, for virus-scanning and url-filtering purposes.

cheers,
&#38;rw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depending on the setup, ssh/https might be quite a lot less suspicious, esp. with an sshd on 443 somewhere.</p>
<p>Though a big company probably makes the classic man-in-the-middle attack on https, for virus-scanning and url-filtering purposes.</p>
<p>cheers,<br />
&amp;rw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tina Marie</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2007/11/17/yeah-that-makes-sense#comment-64269</link>
		<dc:creator>Tina Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 03:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xcski.com/2007/11/17/yeah-that-makes-sense#comment-64269</guid>
		<description>If you can HTTP out, look at HTTPTunnel and Proxifier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you can HTTP out, look at HTTPTunnel and Proxifier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
