Comments on: Oh Google, you are so devoid of any semblance of clue http://blog.xcski.com/2007/09/19/oh-google-you-are-so-devoid-of-any-semblence-of-clue Everything I used to bore people on newsgroups and mailing lists with, now in one inconvenient place. Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:36:49 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: Rants and Revelations » Google gets their collective fingers out http://blog.xcski.com/2007/09/19/oh-google-you-are-so-devoid-of-any-semblence-of-clue#comment-57772 Rants and Revelations » Google gets their collective fingers out Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:37:39 +0000 http://blog.xcski.com/2007/09/19/oh-google-you-are-so-devoid-of-any-semblence-of-clue#comment-57772 [...] Rants and Revelations » Oh Google, you are so devoid of any semblance of clue and Rants and Revelations » Hey, Google for previous ranting about this [...] [...] Rants and Revelations » Oh Google, you are so devoid of any semblance of clue and Rants and Revelations » Hey, Google for previous ranting about this [...]

]]> By: ronebofh@livejournal http://blog.xcski.com/2007/09/19/oh-google-you-are-so-devoid-of-any-semblence-of-clue#comment-51997 ronebofh@livejournal Thu, 20 Sep 2007 06:44:06 +0000 http://blog.xcski.com/2007/09/19/oh-google-you-are-so-devoid-of-any-semblence-of-clue#comment-51997 Don't forget to add in the interest they owe you on the new form. Don’t forget to add in the interest they owe you on the new form.

]]> By: Matt Palmer http://blog.xcski.com/2007/09/19/oh-google-you-are-so-devoid-of-any-semblence-of-clue#comment-51996 Matt Palmer Thu, 20 Sep 2007 06:27:55 +0000 http://blog.xcski.com/2007/09/19/oh-google-you-are-so-devoid-of-any-semblence-of-clue#comment-51996 @David: Not sure I'm allowed to give details -- I suspect Google's legal team isn't as incompetent as their recruiters. Suffice it to say, it included several terms which I found highly disadvantageous, and which I firmly believe are not within the spirit of "Don't be Evil". My recruiter's response was "those clauses are legal, so they're not coming out". @David: Not sure I’m allowed to give details — I suspect Google’s legal team isn’t as incompetent as their recruiters.
Suffice it to say, it included several terms which I found highly disadvantageous, and which I firmly believe are not within the spirit of “Don’t be Evil”. My recruiter’s response was “those clauses are legal, so they’re not coming out”.

]]> By: David Parsons http://blog.xcski.com/2007/09/19/oh-google-you-are-so-devoid-of-any-semblence-of-clue#comment-51993 David Parsons Thu, 20 Sep 2007 06:06:55 +0000 http://blog.xcski.com/2007/09/19/oh-google-you-are-so-devoid-of-any-semblence-of-clue#comment-51993 ??? Which was the offensive part that made you reject their contract, or was it offensive all the way down? ???

Which was the offensive part that made you reject their contract, or was it offensive all the way down?

]]> By: Matt Palmer http://blog.xcski.com/2007/09/19/oh-google-you-are-so-devoid-of-any-semblence-of-clue#comment-51962 Matt Palmer Thu, 20 Sep 2007 01:18:40 +0000 http://blog.xcski.com/2007/09/19/oh-google-you-are-so-devoid-of-any-semblence-of-clue#comment-51962 That's bordering on deliberate negligence. Every time I hear stories like this, I'm affirmed in my decision to tell them to stuff their offensive contract up their fundaments. That’s bordering on deliberate negligence. Every time I hear stories like this, I’m affirmed in my decision to tell them to stuff their offensive contract up their fundaments.

]]>