<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fun fact #143.4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.xcski.com/2007/09/13/fun-fact-1434/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2007/09/13/fun-fact-1434</link>
	<description>Everything I used to bore people on newsgroups and mailing lists with, now in one inconvenient place.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 09:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anthony de Boer</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2007/09/13/fun-fact-1434#comment-49824</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony de Boer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xcski.com/2007/09/13/fun-fact-1434#comment-49824</guid>
		<description>Back when my brother was at ETPS, I got mail from him noting a Sea King's tail rotor is 0.009 nm behind the cockpit and you need to look for a lot more landing clearance than he considered customary; based on that, those airports are about three Sea Things apart, or maybe only two if you consider main rotor clearance ahead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back when my brother was at ETPS, I got mail from him noting a Sea King&#8217;s tail rotor is 0.009 nm behind the cockpit and you need to look for a lot more landing clearance than he considered customary; based on that, those airports are about three Sea Things apart, or maybe only two if you consider main rotor clearance ahead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
