<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Probably not going to happen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.xcski.com/2007/06/05/probably-not-going-to-happen/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2007/06/05/probably-not-going-to-happen</link>
	<description>Everything I used to bore people on newsgroups and mailing lists with, now in one inconvenient place.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Tomblin</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2007/06/05/probably-not-going-to-happen#comment-26966</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tomblin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xcski.com/2007/06/05/probably-not-going-to-happen#comment-26966</guid>
		<description>But Rich, if I did this, I would still have the hassle of changing all my stuff over to new domains whether I got paid or not.  "rent-to-own" is a good solution if the goal is to sell the domain, but not a good solution if the goal is to be compensated for the loss of a stable location for your stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Rich, if I did this, I would still have the hassle of changing all my stuff over to new domains whether I got paid or not.  &#8220;rent-to-own&#8221; is a good solution if the goal is to sell the domain, but not a good solution if the goal is to be compensated for the loss of a stable location for your stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Lafferty</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2007/06/05/probably-not-going-to-happen#comment-26965</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Lafferty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xcski.com/2007/06/05/probably-not-going-to-happen#comment-26965</guid>
		<description>What about holding the domain in trust for him, but pointed at his nameservers, while he pays? That way if he pays in full then you've got the money and he's got the domain and everyone wins, and if he goes out of business then you've got some of the money and you still have the domain to sell later.

Rent-to-own, basically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about holding the domain in trust for him, but pointed at his nameservers, while he pays? That way if he pays in full then you&#8217;ve got the money and he&#8217;s got the domain and everyone wins, and if he goes out of business then you&#8217;ve got some of the money and you still have the domain to sell later.</p>
<p>Rent-to-own, basically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Price</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2007/06/05/probably-not-going-to-happen#comment-26963</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xcski.com/2007/06/05/probably-not-going-to-happen#comment-26963</guid>
		<description>I see no problems with his offer.

Accept the payments for 5-6 years, put the money straight into a savings account, then transfer the domain to him once the balance is paid in full.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see no problems with his offer.</p>
<p>Accept the payments for 5-6 years, put the money straight into a savings account, then transfer the domain to him once the balance is paid in full.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
