Comments on: Nothing is ever easy in the CMS/blogging world. http://blog.xcski.com/2006/09/05/nothing-is-ever-easy-in-the-cmsblogging-world Everything I used to bore people on newsgroups and mailing lists with, now in one inconvenient place. Wed, 08 Oct 2008 03:22:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Barry Price http://blog.xcski.com/2006/09/05/nothing-is-ever-easy-in-the-cmsblogging-world#comment-10832 Barry Price Wed, 06 Sep 2006 01:13:56 +0000 http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/2006/09/05/nothing-is-ever-easy-in-the-cmsblogging-world#comment-10832 Tried <a href="http://drupal.org" rel="nofollow">Drupal?</a> Extensively documented, and very customisable, but probably better for some "flavours" of website than others. I like it for simple CMS sites, anyway. Tried Drupal?

Extensively documented, and very customisable, but probably better for some “flavours” of website than others.

I like it for simple CMS sites, anyway.

]]> By: Tina Marie http://blog.xcski.com/2006/09/05/nothing-is-ever-easy-in-the-cmsblogging-world#comment-10813 Tina Marie Tue, 05 Sep 2006 19:53:11 +0000 http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/2006/09/05/nothing-is-ever-easy-in-the-cmsblogging-world#comment-10813 I have a user or two running xoops, and I'm not fond of it. However, I've actually been less unhappy about the older version that they're recommending now (2.0.something), instead of the latest (2.2.something). I've got another couple of users using PHP-fusion. It seems to be really easy to set up, not terribly difficult to use, and doesn't keep me up as much at night worrying about security. Not sure if it has enough features for you, though. I have a user or two running xoops, and I’m not fond of it. However, I’ve actually been less unhappy about the older version that they’re recommending now (2.0.something), instead of the latest (2.2.something).

I’ve got another couple of users using PHP-fusion. It seems to be really easy to set up, not terribly difficult to use, and doesn’t keep me up as much at night worrying about security. Not sure if it has enough features for you, though.

]]>