<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;d have thunk it?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.xcski.com/2006/08/23/whod-have-thunk-it/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2006/08/23/whod-have-thunk-it</link>
	<description>Everything I used to bore people on newsgroups and mailing lists with, now in one inconvenient place.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 21:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rants and Revelations &#187; Jeppesen Responds</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2006/08/23/whod-have-thunk-it#comment-10111</link>
		<dc:creator>Rants and Revelations &#187; Jeppesen Responds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/2006/08/23/whod-have-thunk-it#comment-10111</guid>
		<description>[...] After receiving the email I mentioned in Rants and Revelations » Who’d have thunk it?, I responded with   I have renamed the part of the Wiki that uses the trademarked word &#8220;NavData&#8221; to &#8220;DAFIFReplacment&#8221;. However, I am going to continue to use the &#8220;/navdata/&#8221; part of the URL as that is a generic term and untrademarkable and changing would break people&#8217;s bookmarks. You can have a look at http://xcski.com/navdata/ if you wish. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] After receiving the email I mentioned in Rants and Revelations » Who’d have thunk it?, I responded with   I have renamed the part of the Wiki that uses the trademarked word &#8220;NavData&#8221; to &#8220;DAFIFReplacment&#8221;. However, I am going to continue to use the &#8220;/navdata/&#8221; part of the URL as that is a generic term and untrademarkable and changing would break people&#8217;s bookmarks. You can have a look at <a href="http://xcski.com/navdata/" rel="nofollow">http://xcski.com/navdata/</a> if you wish. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Tomblin</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2006/08/23/whod-have-thunk-it#comment-10109</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tomblin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/2006/08/23/whod-have-thunk-it#comment-10109</guid>
		<description>www.navdata.net is in the hands of domain speculators.  I think you'd have a hard time convincing a court that "domain speculation" was a legitimate business use of the word, so if the speculators decided to fight, they would have to fight on the generic-ness of the word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.navdata.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.navdata.net</a> is in the hands of domain speculators.  I think you&#8217;d have a hard time convincing a court that &#8220;domain speculation&#8221; was a legitimate business use of the word, so if the speculators decided to fight, they would have to fight on the generic-ness of the word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2006/08/23/whod-have-thunk-it#comment-10107</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/2006/08/23/whod-have-thunk-it#comment-10107</guid>
		<description>One wonders if they're going after the people who own www.navdata.net.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One wonders if they&#8217;re going after the people who own <a href="http://www.navdata.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.navdata.net</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
