<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fuck fuck fuckity fuck fuck fuck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.xcski.com/2006/01/21/fuck-fuck-fuckity-fuck-fuck-fuck/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2006/01/21/fuck-fuck-fuckity-fuck-fuck-fuck</link>
	<description>Everything I used to bore people on newsgroups and mailing lists with, now in one inconvenient place.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vicki</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2006/01/21/fuck-fuck-fuckity-fuck-fuck-fuck#comment-1590</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 01:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/2006/01/21/fuck-fuck-fuckity-fuck-fuck-fuck#comment-1590</guid>
		<description>I think a joint exclusion is a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a joint exclusion is a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexis</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2006/01/21/fuck-fuck-fuckity-fuck-fuck-fuck#comment-1587</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/2006/01/21/fuck-fuck-fuckity-fuck-fuck-fuck#comment-1587</guid>
		<description>Try other insurance companies, or try going through a broker who will hopefully know if there are any insurers out there who are more lenient on joint issues.

A worse option may be to specifically ask for an exclusion on joint issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try other insurance companies, or try going through a broker who will hopefully know if there are any insurers out there who are more lenient on joint issues.</p>
<p>A worse option may be to specifically ask for an exclusion on joint issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
