<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do I care about Internet Explorer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.xcski.com/2005/03/10/do-i-care-about-internet-explorer/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2005/03/10/do-i-care-about-internet-explorer</link>
	<description>Everything I used to bore people on newsgroups and mailing lists with, now in one inconvenient place.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 05:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Root</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2005/03/10/do-i-care-about-internet-explorer#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator>Root</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2005 01:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/2005/03/10/do-i-care-about-internet-explorer#comment-592</guid>
		<description>My technical spec for the Gemini template is *should run consistently* in all the major browsers. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My technical spec for the Gemini template is *should run consistently* in all the major browsers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Tomblin</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2005/03/10/do-i-care-about-internet-explorer#comment-590</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tomblin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/2005/03/10/do-i-care-about-internet-explorer#comment-590</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;LOT of nice styles out there for WP, but many of them aren’t as thoughtfully planned WRT interplay with archive layouts and such&lt;/i&gt;

Thanks for the reminder - I have to fix the archive.php to make it work with WPGallery.  Fortunately I had to do the same fix to the default theme, so I knew exactly what to change.

I've had to make several changes to this theme to get it working right.  The next page/previous page functionality was all screwed up, I wanted the calendar above the other side-bar stuff, etc.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>LOT of nice styles out there for WP, but many of them aren’t as thoughtfully planned WRT interplay with archive layouts and such</i></p>
<p>Thanks for the reminder - I have to fix the archive.php to make it work with WPGallery.  Fortunately I had to do the same fix to the default theme, so I knew exactly what to change.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had to make several changes to this theme to get it working right.  The next page/previous page functionality was all screwed up, I wanted the calendar above the other side-bar stuff, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Guglielmetti</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2005/03/10/do-i-care-about-internet-explorer#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Guglielmetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/2005/03/10/do-i-care-about-internet-explorer#comment-589</guid>
		<description>No.  Two years ago there was a reason to care.  Now, no.  Too many good browsers and too much effort to get the word out there.  There's simply no excuse for having old-ass crap browsers on your machine, except maybe for geeks like you who are curious ad how poorly Gatesian browsers are at handling anything approaching standards-compliant.  Anyone that far behind is probably not going to be interested in a lot of your blog content anyway.  

And yes, there are a LOT of nice styles out there for WP, but many of them aren't as thoughtfully planned WRT interplay with archive layouts and such.  The Default layout has a lot of functionality.  I'm looking to bend the default layout a little, instead of using an entirely new style.  

I am very impressed with WP 1.5.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No.  Two years ago there was a reason to care.  Now, no.  Too many good browsers and too much effort to get the word out there.  There&#8217;s simply no excuse for having old-ass crap browsers on your machine, except maybe for geeks like you who are curious ad how poorly Gatesian browsers are at handling anything approaching standards-compliant.  Anyone that far behind is probably not going to be interested in a lot of your blog content anyway.  </p>
<p>And yes, there are a LOT of nice styles out there for WP, but many of them aren&#8217;t as thoughtfully planned WRT interplay with archive layouts and such.  The Default layout has a lot of functionality.  I&#8217;m looking to bend the default layout a little, instead of using an entirely new style.  </p>
<p>I am very impressed with WP 1.5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Tomblin</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2005/03/10/do-i-care-about-internet-explorer#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tomblin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/2005/03/10/do-i-care-about-internet-explorer#comment-588</guid>
		<description>Well, "MSIE.*Mac_PowerPC" doesn't appear in the top 15 agents in my webalizer logs, but then again the top 15 only add up to 50% of the hits.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, &#8220;MSIE.*Mac_PowerPC&#8221; doesn&#8217;t appear in the top 15 agents in my webalizer logs, but then again the top 15 only add up to 50% of the hits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Price</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2005/03/10/do-i-care-about-internet-explorer#comment-587</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/2005/03/10/do-i-care-about-internet-explorer#comment-587</guid>
		<description>Microsoft ceased all development and support of Mac IE in 2003. It's now an officially "dead" browser.

However, check your access stats to see if a significant number of visitors still use it.  It's up to you to define 'significant'...

This theme is nice though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft ceased all development and support of Mac IE in 2003. It&#8217;s now an officially &#8220;dead&#8221; browser.</p>
<p>However, check your access stats to see if a significant number of visitors still use it.  It&#8217;s up to you to define &#8217;significant&#8217;&#8230;</p>
<p>This theme is nice though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Clarke</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2005/03/10/do-i-care-about-internet-explorer#comment-586</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 04:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/2005/03/10/do-i-care-about-internet-explorer#comment-586</guid>
		<description>OK, that comment  style is kinda cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, that comment  style is kinda cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Clarke</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2005/03/10/do-i-care-about-internet-explorer#comment-585</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 04:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/2005/03/10/do-i-care-about-internet-explorer#comment-585</guid>
		<description>No, because anyone who uses IE 5.2 on the Mac isn't worth caring about.

Maybe you could tweak your CSS to make a bunch of otherwise invisible text appear in big red letters in IE. Message of your choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, because anyone who uses IE 5.2 on the Mac isn&#8217;t worth caring about.</p>
<p>Maybe you could tweak your CSS to make a bunch of otherwise invisible text appear in big red letters in IE. Message of your choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
