<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So how *does* one de-upgrade a computer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.xcski.com/2004/11/15/so-how-does-one-de-upgrade-a-computer/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2004/11/15/so-how-does-one-de-upgrade-a-computer</link>
	<description>Everything I used to bore people on newsgroups and mailing lists with, now in one inconvenient place.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: baz</title>
		<link>http://blog.xcski.com/2004/11/15/so-how-does-one-de-upgrade-a-computer/comment-page-1#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>baz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xcski.com/wordpress/?p=375#comment-460</guid>
		<description>Is there an RPM for a "vanilla" 2.4 kernel under Fedora?  Would it be worth rolling your own?

Without wanting to start a distro war, I'm a long time Debian user - from experience, it's usually very conservative when it comes to hitting the hardware.  You will get "stable" hardware support as opposed to "optimised", with a reasonably selection of kernel images.

Having said that - AHS, ASS.  You're screwed either way.

And I doubt that the thought of attempting the Red Hat -&gt; Debian mindshift before the weekend is very appealing anyway...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there an RPM for a &#8220;vanilla&#8221; 2.4 kernel under Fedora?  Would it be worth rolling your own?</p>
<p>Without wanting to start a distro war, I&#8217;m a long time Debian user - from experience, it&#8217;s usually very conservative when it comes to hitting the hardware.  You will get &#8220;stable&#8221; hardware support as opposed to &#8220;optimised&#8221;, with a reasonably selection of kernel images.</p>
<p>Having said that - AHS, ASS.  You&#8217;re screwed either way.</p>
<p>And I doubt that the thought of attempting the Red Hat -> Debian mindshift before the weekend is very appealing anyway&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
